CEO of Roddenberry Productions Rod Roddenberry announced today that Roddenberry Productions has entered into a deal with Brian Grazer and Ron Howard’s Imagine Television to develop the Gene Roddenberry pilot “The Questor Tapes.” The announcement was made at the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences Hall of Fame induction ceremony where Rod Roddenberry accepted the posthumous honor…

“The Questor Tapes” was originally conceived as a television series pilot about an android with incomplete memory tapes who searches for his creator and his purpose. The pilot ultimately aired as a 1974 television movie. (The Questor character became the inspiration for Data, one of the most compelling characters in Star Trek: The Next Generation.)  (via Roddenberry)

With so many of us out there searching for who we are and what our purpose is in life The Questor Tapes has a lot of potential to resonate with audiences.  Gene Roddenberry felt “that the show had the potential to be bigger than Star Trek.”  I can see the potential in it but as Dollhouse has shown us there will be two main obstacles to overcome to get bigger then Star Trek with this theme.  First, the delivery will have to be subtle but not too subtle or else the audiences won’t get what is really being addressed.  Secondly, getting the major broadcasters to play ball.

More on The Questor Tapes here

Related posts

• Why Progressive Speculative Fiction? (0)
• What makes a fan a fan? (0)
• The Lost Art of Speculative Fiction (1)
• Taking Star Trek Seriously (103)
• Star Trek Supports the Writers (0)

I find myself thinking about the “Good Old Days” a lot lately.  This is not just a condition of thirty-somethings like me.  A surprising number of twenty-somethings I know are doing it to

Telling War Stories

There is some value in sitting around with your friends telling stories about our pasts.  It is how we come to know each other.

With increasing frequency, I have noticed that stories are not shared as memories, but as a wish for a return to our glory days.

Times Arrow

We are propelled forever into the future, writing ever more moments of our lives into the past.  Everything changes.  What is important is that we do not allow ourselves to become mired in the past.  We can learn from our past, but there is no known power in the cosmos that will allow us to return to a time already lived.

When a chapter closes, we have to turn the page and write the best words we can on the page.

The Best is yet to come

Believe me.  Several times, I have thought my best days were behind me.  The though enters all of our minds from time to time.  The fact is, it is easier to look back than it is to look forward.  We know the past.

Might I suggest we learn how to know the future.

• Plans help
• Goals motivate
• Hope enlivens

We have to find a way to have all three.  That is why I am thankful to Gene Roddenberry.  Star Trek gave me a vision of the future that is hard to strip away from my eyes.  The world I want to live in doesn’t exist yet.  I have too much work to do to waste time looking back.

How do you keep yourself looking forward?

Related posts

• Why Progressive Speculative Fiction? (0)
• What makes a fan a fan? (0)
• Welcoming 2010 a little late (2)
• The Lost Art of Speculative Fiction (1)
• The End of the HTML Blog (0)

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Podcast (speculative-fiction-tody): Play in new window | Download

Fandom Today new intro | New Format | Gene Roddenberry Speaks | What we are up to | dashPunk updates | entertainment Design | Fan Groups: Legend of the Seeker, Dollhouse, Sanctuary, Vidders Guild | Best Worst and the Odd on Fandom Today.

New Intro

• Discussion of the new intro for Fandom Today and what Gene Roddenberry says in it.
• New Format
• e-Music

A Peek Behind the Curtain

• Our thoughts on dashPunk, what we are up to, and the relaunch with updates on where we are.
• Audible

In the Works

• We talk about other projects in the works
  • Entertainment Design
  • Fan Groups
    • Legend of the Seeker / Sword of Truth
    • Dollhouse
    • Vidders Guild For Fandom
• dashPunk Shop

The Best, The Worst, and The Odd

• Brian’s Birthday
• Monday Oct 26 is ‘most unproductive day’ (via Telegraph)
• Best and Worst experiences of the relaunch

Subscribe

Subscribe to Fandom Today Subscribe in a reader

Get your shopping at: Amazon.com, iTunes Music Store, iTunes TV Showsand iTunes Audiobooks

Netflix lets you rent, watch and return DVDs from home - Try free for 2 weeks

Don't wait. Guarantee your seat before you go and avoid a sold out show. Skip the box office lines and buy movie tickets at Fandango.com.

GameFly delivers the best video games to your door! Start for only $8.95 or Try for free

Related posts

• Podcasts (3)
• Speculative Fiction Today #421 “Trippy Groovy On My Bongo Man” (0)
• Speculative Fiction Today #413 “Hodgman’s Nerd Test” (0)
• Speculative Fiction Today #409 “Vampire Hunter V” (0)
• Speculative Fiction Today #382 “X-Men Done Right” (0)

I was a little afraid to see the new Star Trek Movie.  All of the materials they sent me to hype the movie either bored or annoyed me.  I started getting a little excited about the movie after the early screenings started returning good reviews.

Sitting in the theater as boring trailers, my anticipation ramped up as film crept ever closer.  I love Star Trek.  It is probably my favorite franchise.  I really hoped they wouldn’t mess it up.

It took me a while to write this review, because I wanted to make sure I got past my fanboy response to the movie and was able to talk about the movie with a bit more distance and clarity.

What should Star Trek be?

Gene Roddenberry’s concept of Star Trek was a simple formula:

• Action
• Adventure
• Basic wants and needs

But it should also tackle all of the most important issues of the day.  (You can read more about this in my post: More Proof J. J. Abrams Doesn’t Get Star Trek).  The early publicity left me with many concerns.

Addressing early concerns

Prequel/Sequel/Reboot

I was really confused about the nature of the film when they started calling is a prequel/sequel/reboot.

That is a strange thing to say, and alone, a statement that doesn’t make sense, but for this film it works.

• Sequel
  • Spock starts on Romulus like he is in the Next Generation
  • The first Federation uniforms we see are right out of Star Trek Enterprise.
  • Time travel story
• Prequel
  • Young versions of the characters
• Reboot
  • Establishes an alternate timeline for Star Trek

I am not sure I like the classification of this movie as a reboot.  Battlestar Galactica was a reboot, this was more of a return to the core of what made Star Trek great in the original series.  If this is a reboot so was:

• The Animated Series (added more exotic alien races)
• The Motion Picture (changed the Kligons forever)
• Wrath of Khan (Brought back the Action/Adventure quality of the series.
• Voyage Home (The crew of the Enterprise mess with the timeline)
• The Next Generation (updated the series for a new generation of fans)
• Deep Space Nine (Star Trek without exploration but with more military elements)
• Generations (Kirk is ripped from the timeline)
• Voyager (Star Trek without the Federation)
• First Contact (The Borg and the crew of the Enterprise mess with the timeline)
• Insurrection (The Federation is not perfect)
• Enterprise (Star Trek before the Federation without superior technology)

If you would count each of these major revisions of the setting as a reboot, than this movie is a reboot.  To me, this sequel/prequel.

Turning Star Trek into Star Wars?

Abrams, Kurtzman anf Orci all said they wanted to turn bring more Star Wars into Star Trek, but I don’t think they got there.  I love both series, and I am familiar with the main qualities of both, and I don’t think they brought much if anything from one to the other.

I was afraid that is was going to be more of a Lethal Weapon in Space, Speed: Warp 10, Star Wars: The Vulcan Chronicles, or Cloverfield 2: The Future of the Beast (WTF Star Trek Super Bowl Ad!?!).  There is not a scene in this film that I could see easily fitting in one of the earlier films or the original television series.

Maybe they originally thought of Nero’s ship as a sort of Death Star, but it is no more than Probe from The Voyage Home, V’ger from the Motion Picture, or the Son’a ships from Insurrection.  Other than that, I just don’t get it.

Uhura in her off hours

I was excited when I saw the clip of Uhura telling Kirk off in the bar.  I hoped Kirk would get his butt kicked and he so did.  I was concerned about the stripping clips of Uhura in the trailers but I love the way the dealt with her.

———-Spoiler Alert!!———-

I loved the relationship between Uhura and Spock.  It made sence, and it served to dehumanize Spock in an interesting way.  The juxtaposition of her emotions and his total lack of emotions really hilighted the difference between humans and vulcans.

I know there are a lot of people who didn’t like her depiction in this movie, but Uhura was always a more laid back member of the crew.

Addressing new concerns after seeing the movie

Kirk’s Vaccine reaction

I loved the adverse reaction that Kirk had to the Vaccine that McCoy gave him.  It was a flashback to the kind of humor the original series thrived on.  It was silly, light hearted and interfered with the characters ability to do what they needed to do.

The Engine Room of Doom!

WTF were they thinking when they designed the engine room.  It was funny, but I agree with Gwen DeMarco regarding the fate of the writer who came up with the idea for these scenes…

I could go off on a long string blue words, but I will let the others who have already done that do it.  I just thought this was a blemish on an otherwise great film.

Nero’s ship armament

Brian and I argued about this fro a long time after the movie.  Personally, I think Nero was just a MacGuffin to give an excuse for the story to happen.  Neither he nor his crew are intgral to the plot and could have been replaced by anyone else with any other motive using any other means.  Nero is not important. They obviously didn’t give his subplot any thought, and frankly, the movie would have been better without the distraction.

I wish the film would have had a real 3 dimensional villain, but I honestly didn’t expect one from a J. J. Abrams movie.  He has never done villains well.  Every movie and show that he has ever touch has had a weak, impotent, or flat villain.  A better director would have insisted on a better antagonist, but the story didn’t matter, the action did.

Kirk’s Exile from the Enterprise

Some people have complained about Spock having Kirk put in a life pod and jettisoned from the ship.  If I really wanted to defend the movie here I would say that this was a symptom of Spock’s frustration that Kirk should not be on the ship at all.  I think that could be argued.

Once more, this is another symptom of Abrams’ half-assed directing style.  He needed to have Kirk on the planet to meet Spock and this was the quickest and most “visually exciting” way to do it.  Let’s be honest, this was an excuse to have Kirk chased by a Cloverfield reject so he could talk to Spock in a cave.  It was not thought out.

Nero’s Motives

Nero’s motive for attacking Vulcan are nothing less than laughable.  He was a stupid man on a stupid ship with the horridly named “Red Matter” who wants to destroy Vulcan rather than save his homeworld.

Maybe he thought he could do both.  Rid the Empire of the threat of the Federation and save his homeworld.  I think the reallity is a lot simpler.

Like most of the annoying things in this film it just wasn’t well thought out.  It was a flimsy excuse for a Nero to be a villain and commit a terrorist act without having to think about whether or not he has a good (or at least understandable) reason or not.

Nero is a flat, empty character and I can tell you why.  This movie is nothing more than:

Wrath of Khan, take 2

This story follows the plot of Wrath of Khan beat by beat with several notable exceptions:

• Nero is not as scary as Khan.
• Nero does not have a motive for revenge.
• “Red Matter” is not as scary as the Genesis Device.
• Wrath of Khan had better writers and director.

This movie is to Wrath of Khan what the Next Generation episode “Naked Now” is to the Original Series episode “Naked Time.”  It is a good remake, but it is not as good as the original.

Is this Star Trek?

Let’s measure it against Gene’s definition

√ Action
√ Adventure
√ Basic wants and needs
√ Tackle all of the most important issues of the day.

That last check might be a little controversial, but I thought the show dealt with the random nature of terrorism and the emotional cost it has on people.

Star Trek’s New Phase

I am glad to say that Star Trek has been reborn, much as it was when Wrath of Khan came out.  I loved the movie.

Likes

• Canon Uniforms
• Spock’s relationship with the Romulans
• Characters were perfect
• Not just an action film
• great FX
• sense of humor

Dislikes

• The Engine room
• Lack of a serious villain
• Nero’s Ship
• “Red Matter”
• The Alien Monster
• Kirk’s marooning

Rating = 10

The Future of Star Trek

Orci and Kurtzmen have already signed on to write the next movie in the series, but that are not sure if it will be a Prequel, Sequel, or Reboot to this movie.  They said they are waiting to see what the reaction to this film is.  And there is one more thing:

Kurtzman: The very last scene when Spock and Spock meet each other, finally. And elder Spock is convincing young Spock that he couldn’t interfere, because it would have diverted [Kirk and Spock] away from their friendship. And that their friendship is the key to the whole sort of shebang.

Orci: He gave him a recorded message from Kirk.

Kurtzman: He [elder Spock] said, “Don’t take my word for it.” And he handed him [younger Spock] a little holographic device and it projected Shatner. It was basically a Happy Birthday wish knowing that Spock was going to go off to Romulus, and Kirk would probably be dead by the time… (Topless Robots)

That could be the set up for the next movie.  Personally, I don’t want another movie.  I want a TV series.

Related posts

• New Star Trek Posters- Nero, Uhura, and a Treat (0)
• WTF Star Trek Super Bowl Ad!?! (0)
• Star Trek is not a reboot? (0)
• P:SI #275 “Vader Say Manamana” (0)
• New Star Trek Clip: Uhura has a brain, Kirk is an Ass (0)

Out this week we have three DVDs to feature:  Gene Roddenberry’s Earth: Final Conflict – Season 1, Doctor Who: The E-Space Trilogy, Doctor Who: Battlefield.

• Gene Roddenberry’s Earth: Final Conflict – Season 1:  I loved this show Gene Roddenberry put an interesting spin on the invaded earth story.  The Taelons show up as benevolent neighbors with technology that has solved pollution and many of Earth’s other problems but under the surface is up to something.
• Classic Doctor Who on DVD!!!!!!!
  • Doctor Who: The E-Space Trilogy:  From the Tom Baker era.  This set has episodes Full Circle/State of Decay/Warriors’ Gate (Episodes 112-114)
  • Doctor Who: Battlefield:  From the Sylvester McCoy era.  In this four-part storyline the Doctor, Ace and Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart team up with UNIT to battle the evil Queen Morgaine and throngs of Arthurian opponents who think the Doctor is the legendary wizard Merlin.

Related posts

• P:SI #283 “The Twilight of Star Trek” (0)
• BBC, Ask Tom Baker Nicely (0)
• A 9 Year old Moffat Clue? (0)
• You Can Be The Last Dalek! (2)
• Wii Want Doctor Who In Near Real Time (0)

After pushing the new Star Trek movie as a reboot of the franchise, writers Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman are starting to push back.

It’s clear that most people are not interested in yet another reboot, and even less are interested in a reboot of Star Trek.  It is interesting to see how they are changing the context of the film from a reboot to a prequel/sequel.

From Reboot to Prequel/Sequel

Orci said, “We couldn’t imagine not having this movie somehow fall within some degree of continuity. We don’t accept the word reboot. Reboot does not actually describe the fact that this movie would not be possible without the 10 movies that came prior to it. The very events of the movie themselves are caused by Leonard Nimoy as Mr. Spock and his story, which picks up essentially after the last movie, Star Trek 10 [Nemesis]. … So our movie is both a prequel and a sequel. It’s a sequel if you’re a fan, and a prequel if you’re not (SCI FI Wire).”

Honestly, I don’t know what to think about this.  I am not sure if it is:

• the writers starting to revolt against what they feel is an unfair characterization of this movie
• a new marketing push to rebrand a movie that is not gaining much traction

I want to be hopeful, and believe they are telling the truth, but the good feeling doesn’t last long.

Time Travel and Canon

Why is the time-travel element necessary?

Orci: I don’t think that fits into the classic definition of a reboot. So it was necessary for that. And it’s also necessary in order to both connect the world to the original Star Trek, but then also to then give us the dramatic license and the dramatic stakes of having an unknown future in the movie.

Kurtzman: Yeah, the biggest thing I think we all hiccuped on, just conceptually, when Trek was presented to us was, “Well, we know how they all died. We know what happened to them.” And when you know that, it’s very difficult to put them in jeopardy in a way that feels fresh or original. How do you ever have real stakes to your characters?

…

This also conveniently allows you to violate canon, such as it is, if necessary.

Orci: Well, again, it’s a continuation of canon. If words have precise meaning, it’s not technically a canon violation (SCI FI Wire).

They are going out of their way to try to keep this movie in the prequel/sequel category.

I find it hilarious to see any Star Trek writer talk about cannon.  Every fan knows that ever since Gene Roddenberry died, continuity has not exactly been a preoccupation of the continuity.  Whenever it was convenient, they have abandoned canon.  Kurtzman does make a good point that by adding an element of time travel, it does mean that no one is safe.

Star Wars in Star Trek

I have already gone into detail about my fears that they are going to make the new Star Trek film too much like Star Wars (see it here), so I won’t repeat myself, but Orci and Kurtzman have given me more to chew on:

Orci: Well, my short quick answer on that up front is Star Wars had a little bit more of an archetypal, mythological structure. That differentiated it from Star Trek to a certain degree in that Star Trek was a little bit more classical science fiction. Star Wars is fantasy, really.

So, as a result of it being fantasy, the story, I think, was a little bit more mythologically drawn.

Kurtzman: I think what we know is that … Star Trek is about naval battles, and, at its best, is always about out-thinking your opponent. … But there’s a reality to the way that people watch movies today. … Which is that you cannot honestly expect … a 12-year-old boy to walk into a theater and to go sit through two hours of very slow naval battle. It’s just not going to work.

… There has to be an updating there. And yet you have to stay entirely true to the spirit of Trek. So the challenge then becomes “How do you marry those two things?” And … the way that we put it is that there’s plenty of naval battles in a way that’s familiar and a way that seems very Trek. But … the difference between Star Trek and Star Wars is that Star Wars has always been about speed. … It’s dogfights versus slow ship fights (SCI FI Wire).

Ok, I am not sure what to make out of this.  I really want to remind them of the space battles from the Dominion War in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, or in Voyager, or Enterprise.  You don’t have to look outside the franchise to find fast paced action.

I also have a problem with the invocation of the 12 year old boy.  They have been dumbing down entertainment for so long, that they now feel that they have to cater to the short attention spans they created.

I suppose I should be comforted that their contribution to the franchise will be to remove what little science fiction remains.

Forget everything you know

So remember:

• It’s not a reboot
• It’s a prequel/sequel
• It will be fast paced
• It will not by Science Fiction or Scifi
• It was made just for 12 year old boys, not for general audiences
• It is true to cannon

Wait?? What?? Forget everything I know?  Ok, I will.  I will expect:

• wooden 2 dimensional characters
• no plot
• nothing thought provoking
• lots of shaky cam
• lots of explosions
• fantasy creatures around every corner

I didn’t expect the sequel to Lord of the Rings to be a Star Trek film but game on…

PS: J. J. Abrams’ “Creativity” and “Imagination”

Related posts

• Saving Star Trek (7)
• Why Progressive Speculative Fiction? (0)
• The Fan Spectrum (2)
• Star Trek After Roddenberry (0)
• Review: Star Trek (0)

In August last year had a bit of back and forth over the definition of a Fan with Eoghann Irving from Solar Flare:

Eoghann Irving has posted an interesting rebuttal to my post, Fandom v The Scifi Channel, where he tackles the question What makes a fan? The critique of my position is an interesting one, and I have to say, I agree with his assertion that it sounds like I am trying to say that fans define themselves by their interest in SF.

While there are some who have adopted the fan culture for themselves, cultural adoption is not a requirement to be a fan.

What is a Fan?

We are fans.

We love music, stories, characters, settings, and images.
We know about what we love.
We participate in what we love.
We support what we love.
What we love supports us.

Fans are special.  We are more than just enthusiasts who enjoy a piece of work, fans connect with the work.  We feel it.

Fans love

Fans share a bond with the works they love and with one another.   Fans’ passion is infectious, spreading the the works they love to others.

The love of a fan is a blessing to a responsible creator, but it is a curse to the reckless.

• Farscape fans kept the series alive despite the many attempts by the network to cancel it.
• Star Trek fans helped kept the series alive until the death of Gene Roddenberry when studio pushed the franchise away from its heart.
• Heroes and X-files fans fell in love with disparate aspects of their respective franchises, but when the series lost their way through a lack of focus on the part of the studios.

If a fan’s love is scorned or goes unappreciated, the fan reacts in the same way a jilted lover would.  If a fan’s heart turns cold, it is almost impossible to rekindle it.

Fans Know

Fans know things about the things they love and enthusiasts don’t.

Anyone can quote Star Trek or Star Wars because many of the aphorisms have gone mainstream, but a Star Wars Fan knows who Ulic Qel-Droma and Exar Kun are.  They have become such an important part of the Saga.  They know the Chewbacca died on Sernpidal during the Yuuzhan Vong war trying to save Han Solo’s youngest son.

Fandom is not defined by obscure knowledge.  On the contrary, a fans love for a franchise causes them to seek out everything they can from that franchise.  We read the books and watch the OVAs.  A fan remembers the details and more often than not knows the minutia.

Fans participate

Fans create and enjoy filk, fanfiction, fan films, fan art, costumes and conventions.  We often play role playing games, video games and MMOs in the settings we love.

Fan participation is the most commonly mocked aspects of SF fandom.  No one mocks a music fan’s attendance of a concert or a sport fan attending a game.  They don’t even mock the wearing of band shirts or sports jerseys, or fantasy football or rock and roll camp.  These are not different from conventions, or filk, or role playing, or cosplay.

Fans support

Fans support what we love.  We buy the books, DVDs, and games.

This is where modern fandom is in the most trouble.  The studios and publishers have not offered fans the options they want for media they consume.  DRM (digital rights management) and region codes restrict how and where media can me viewed.

International fans often have few options for obtaining media other than piracy.

Media companies have to listen to the fans and make media available in as many ways as possible to they do not drive money away.  They also must learn that they are not owners of their franchises, they are caretakers and conservators.  The tighter they hold on to outdated and outmoded concepts of ownership, the smaller market they will have and the most desperate they will become.

What we love supports us.

Fans often gather insight and inspiration from the franchises they love.  In moments of fear, I have found myself reciting the Bene Geseret prayer from Dune.  It is also not uncommon for fans to quote dialogue to make a point.

These franchises are not just shows or books we like.  More than we realize they are the myths that help us:

1. talk about the aspects of life that are impossible to discuss straight on.
2. see the connections between our lives and the transcendent mysteries.
3. develop a pattern of living with honor, integrity, and purpose.
4. react the trial, tribulations, and joyful moments of life.

This is why fans embraced the movie Galaxy Quest.  It is a love letter to fandom, showing at its most extreme, but also showing it for what it is.  A culture that gives hope and inspiration to millions.

Are you a fan?

Here are a few questions to ask yourself.  The more times you answer yes, the better the likelihood you are a fan.

• Have you ever connected with a work on a deep level?
• Have you ever enjoyed something so much you rushed to tell someone?
• Have you ever played a game, watched an OVA, or read a book that is part of the extended universe of a franchise you love?
• Have you ever debated or conversed with someone about an aspect of a franchise’s setting or the minutia of a setting?
• Have you ever dressed up as one of your favorite characters?
• Have you ever attended an SF convention?
• Have you ever bought a boxset?
• Have you ever quoted SF to make a point?

Related posts

• Why Progressive Speculative Fiction? (0)
• Where have all the SF Fans gone? (1)
• Star Trek is not a reboot? (0)
• Speculative Fiction Today #394 “For Everything Else There’s Fwoosh” (0)
• Review: Star Trek (0)

Individual science fiction stories may seem as trivial as ever to the blinder critics and philosophers of today- but the core of science fiction, its essence, the concept about which resolves, has become crucial to our salvation if we are to be saved at all.

Isaac Asimov, “My Own View,” The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction

While Asimov was interested solely with Science Fiction, I believe the same can be said about Speculative Fiction as a whole. Many of the problems we face cannot be faced solely by working to fix the present conditions. If we do not explore the possible futures our choices could produce, we walk blindly into the future.

It is change, continuing change inevitable change, that is the dominant factor in society today. No sensible decision can be made any longer without taking into account not only the world as it is, but the word as it will be – and naturally this means that there must be an accurate perception of the world as it will be. This, in turn, means that our statesmen, our businessmen, our Everyman, must take on a science fictional way of thinking, whether he likes it or not or even whether he knows it or not. Only so can the deadly problems of today be solved.

Isaac Asimov, “My Own View,” The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction

Again, I would broaden his words out to all of Speculative Fiction.

Lovecraft’s Mythos

Numerous horror novels/movies have shown us the problems eugenics would unleash upon our societies. Lestat’s hope that there is some good in the universe heightens his fear and motivates him to find the answers.

H. P. Lovecraft’s fiction had a simple message behind the supernatural horror.  Humankind’s chief sin is hubris.  We think too highly of ourselves, and as a result blind ourselves to the fact that somewhere in this vast cosmos, there are creatures who are infinitely more powerful than we are, and whose motives are unfathomable by human logic.

Cthulu, Nyarlahotep, Azathoth, the color out of space, and the color out of time are all horrifying warnings that if we lie to ourselves, pretending there is not a bigger fish out there, we will eventually be devoured by it.

Frankenstein

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is an all too familiar cautionary tale about scientific and technological advance without the restraining forces of morality and common sense.  The tale has been told and retold, spawning an entire subgenre of horror about the dangers of dabbling in things not understood.

The Resident Evil franchise, Godzilla, and so many others I could spend the rest of the year naming them have picked up the mantle and and shared the horrific future we could create for ourselves if we are not careful to think ahead and not blindly rush into the future.

Star Trek

Showed us a future we could hope for.  Imagine a world  where hunger and poverty were removed from the equation.  New challenges would raise their heads, some of which would threaten to return us to the barbaric world we had left behind.

Gene Roddenberry kindled a vision in the hearts and minds of his fans of a world of limitless possibilities.  A world were our only limitations were our imagination and our character.  It is a world to strive towards.

Lord of the Rings

In the Lord of the Rings books, J. R. R. Tolkien showed us a world on the cusp of transition from one age to another.  His mythic prose illuminated the choices that people have to make when culture finds itself on the crossroads of history.

The basic choice is demonstrated through the characters of Sauroman and Gandolf.  Their world, their age was ending.  They had the choice to either embrace the future and try to make the new world a better place to live, or to hold on the past and seek the destruction of the new world before it comes.  Gandolf chose the first path, Sauromon chose the latter.

Star Wars

Anakin Skywalker is faced with the same choice in the Star Wars saga.  At first he fights the future out of his attachment, but when he is faced with the ultimate decision, watching the future be destroyed in the person of his son, he learns that he must let go of his attachments and help the future come.

I wonder if that is why more people don’t love the prequel trilogy.  It touches a nerve in them, and despite our bravado, no one really wants to think of themselves as Darth Vader.  No one wants to entertain the thought that they could destroy everything they believe in and care for as a result of trying to protect it.

Like all great stories, Star Wars holds a mirror up to us and says, this could be you.

We need Progressive Speculative Fiction

Many things are hard to talk about.  Stories can often show us things we would not or could not have seen otherwise.

Next time, we will discuss the differences between Positive Scifi and Progressive Speculative Fiction.

Related posts

• Star Trek is not a reboot? (0)
• Project: Shadow Manifesto (0)
• What makes a fan a fan? (0)
• The Fan Spectrum (2)
• Speculative Fiction Today #396 “Cheeper, Shorter With More Cut” (0)

I feel alone lately as a fan of Speculative Fiction.  Many of the people I talk to have never heard of it, and others have had a hard time wrapping their head around the concept, so I have decided to talk about the lost art of speculative fiction.

Art of the Imagination

Speculative Fiction (SF) is the art of the imagination.  Any story, video, image, or song that answers the question, “What if?” is SF.   There are five main subgenres of SF:

• Science Fiction
• Scifi
• Fantasy
• Horror
• Alternative History

I meet a lot of people who lack an imagination.  Most are not fans of SF, but what frightens me more than anything is the number of writers/would-be writers who don’t have an imagination.

Many people believe that SF is easy to write, when nothing could be father from reality.  Great SF requires more imagination and work than any other genre of fiction.  Not only does the writer have to create a good story, but they also have to construct a new world that is internally consistent and filled with an immaculate reality that will engage the reader/viewer/listener in the setting and story.

The problem with the industry is that too many writers with little to no imagination have found employment making SF because their work is commercially viable to the mass market and lacks any of the qualities great or even good works should have.  They too often forget the one thing that SF should do:

Transcend Limits

The last time SF was popular in the mass market, a spirit of activism, adventure, and dream pervaded the works.  Not all of them, but enough for the the majority of SF fans to be satisfied with many of the films and series launched.  Since then, post-modern fiction styles have dominated print, television and movies, as a result the recent SF works have lacked any depth.

Pioneering SF writers/creators like Frank Herbert, Gene Roddenberry, Harlan Ellison, David Gerrold, et al, believed that SF could challenge peoples preconceptions and inspire them to transcend the limits imposed upon them by their upbringing and culture. They wrote and produced SF that attacked our sacred cows, presenting the world as it could/should be with all of the ambiguity and possibility that this world offers us.

This is the SF I love, produce and support. The trite cynicism that has again become en vogue is antithetical to this spirit of transformative fiction that inspired so many to fall in love with science and hope for a better world. It does not have to go this way. We must reclaim the spirit and art that made SF great.

The Search for Meaning

The root of the problem is simple:

• We hope for a meaning and purpose for our lives and when we find that nature does not provide us with an easy answer we can slavishly follow after, we assume life is devoid of meaning and purpose all together. Nihilism is an easy trap to fall into, but is also an easy one to escape.

Sure, life has no grand overriding purpose… or does it? Life seems to exist to survive, thrive, and evolve. With the exception of evolution, these are not very inspiring goals, but the urge to better ourselves and grow throughout our life is a fundamental function, if not purpose of existence.

This is no reason to despair. The fact that life does not impose a purpose on us allows us to find or invent one for ourselves. What a liberating gift from the universe! We are free to choose our purpose and to find meaning for ourselves.

Now, I won’t lie to you. This is a burden to bare, there is no doubt about that, but it is a burden that is easy for us to take up, if we choose to live boldly.

For too long, we have lived our lives under the constraints and limitations placed upon us by society. We have to rise above the nihilistic stupor, and make the world we want to live in.

Let’s All Dream Again

We have to rise up, stand up, speak out, and most of all dream. If we do not, then the future is indeed lost, but not because of destiny, but because we have let it follow that path.

Dream again, and dream big. Find something to be for, not something to be against. We are strong and imaginative enough to rise above any darkness that comes upon us. Rise up! Let’s take our future back!

This post was inspired by The Lost Art of Speculative Fiction, which I originally posted on March 14, 2008.

Related posts

• The Lost Art of Speculative Fiction (1)
• Gerrold on Trek (0)
• Why Progressive Speculative Fiction? (0)
• Where have all the SF Fans gone? (1)
• What makes a fan a fan? (0)

Pimped Dolphin | Dark Matter | Star Wars Holiday Filk song | The Real Shaq | Twilight | Voltron | Gene Roddenberry | Star Trek | Netflix | Doctor Who | and God Forbid Today on the Project: Shadow Informant.

Culture

• New Dolphin Discovered (via Cryptomundo)
• Physicists Find Dark Matter? (via Beam Me Up)
• Holiday Special Filk Song (via Star Wars)
• The Real Shaq is on Twitter and He’s a Must-Follow (via Mashable)

Movie

• In Theater: Twilight (dashPunk)
• Voltron Fights Giant Monsters and Legal Troubles (via SuperheroFlix)
• Gene Roddenberry’s Favorite Star Trek Episodes (dashPunk)
  • More Proof J. J. Abrams Doesn’t Get Star Trek (dashPunk)
  • We Pass Judgment On Abrams’ Trek (via Sci Fi Wire)

TV / Series

• Netflix: On NXE And Sony… (via GayGamer)
• Who favorite talks Time Lords (via BBC)

Music

• GOD FORBID: ‘Earthsblood’ Release Date Announced (via Blistering Metal)

Webcomic

• Looking For Group

Subscribe

Subscribe to Project: Shadow Informant Subscribe in a reader

Don’t wait. Guarantee your seat before you go and  avoid a sold out show. Skip the box office lines and buy movie tickets at Fandango.com.

GameFly delivers the best video games to your door! Start for only $8.95 or Try for free

Related posts

• Why Progressive Speculative Fiction? (0)
• What makes a fan a fan? (0)
• Star Trek is not a reboot? (0)
• Speculative Fiction Today #429 “Diary of a Flashing Vampire” (0)
• Speculative Fiction Today #418 “Boff you Before I Cliff You” (0)